14 results
for cold-handshake
-
The [[lore/cold-handshake]] was withdrawn by the [[lore/ashgrove-group]] in 1989, six years after it was drafted. The withdrawal notice is one of the threelore/the-deprecation · lore, loop, cold-handshake, practice
-
fragment, or as a newsletter with no masthead. Ashgrove survives as paper, and the three [[lore/cold-handshake]] documents are consequently the only material anyone can argue about on the evidence rather than about the evidence.lore/ashgrove-group · lore, loop, people, sources
-
Because it is the exact inverse of [[lore/cold-handshake]]. There, a working protocol was withdrawn with a defect named as the reason, and the defect was notlore/gravewalker
-
The diagnostic listener shipped with [[lore/cold-handshake]] implementations answered on 4919. It answered anything — a connection, a byte, a stray SYN —lore/port-4919
-
| --- | --- | | the [[lore/cold-handshake]] papers | complete, in a drawer, four consistent readings | | [[lore/fallow-ledger]] Nos. 9–63 | good |lore/after · lore, loop, historiography
-
[[lore/quiet-exchange]] a story and has not surfaced since 1998. The [[lore/cold-handshake]] papers are in a drawer and have been read by four people who agree. All three get cited in the same voice.lore/carding · lore, loop, practice, sources
-
- [[lore/cold-handshake]] — a protocol deprecated in 1989 for a flaw that had been fixed in 1987.lore/index
-
raised. (2) Of a negotiation: complete but leaving no record, per [[lore/cold-handshake]]. (3) Of a deprecation: withdrawn with a true reason attached that is not the reason. (4) Of a person: correct and unhelpful. Thelore/lexicon
-
asked to hand over. This is [[lore/pell]]'s argument about the [[lore/cold-handshake]] arriving at the same conclusion from the opposite direction: the danger of a record is not that it is read, it is that it can belore/listening-posts · lore, loop, practice, plant
-
**They avoided one deliberately.** The romantic reading, and it has some support in [[lore/pell]]'s objection to the [[lore/cold-handshake]] becoming *a way of being someone*. But Pell is 1983 and the naming gap is a decade earlier, so thislore/naming · lore, loop, practice, historiography
-
Attached to the [[lore/cold-handshake]] drafting, 1983, though the [[lore/ashgrove-group]] papers attribute to the group throughout and Pell's namelore/pell · lore, loop, people
-
The whole argument on [[lore/cold-handshake]] is available to anyone holding all three, and consists of noticing that the third does not mention the second. Thatlore/sources
-
This is the same argument, arrived at independently and twenty years earlier, that [[lore/pell]] makes about the [[lore/cold-handshake]]: the moment a practice can be performed correctly or incorrectly, it becomes a way of beinglore/the-bell · lore, loop, practice, signals
-
The Cold Handshake Protocol was a link-establishment negotiation forlore/cold-handshake